IMPORTANT INFO

History 206-01 (CRN 31184)
Mon, Wed, Fri 10-11:25
Music 113
Office: Faculty Towers 201A
Instructor: Dr. Schmoll
Office Hours: Mon and Wed 11:30-12:30
…OR MAKE AN APPOINTMENT!!!

Office Phone: 654-6549

Sunday, March 29, 2015

HOMEWORK/READING FOR WEEK ONE

1. Watch the map and listen to the presentation:

2. Read the following:
The Congress of Vienna

"Despite his defeat, Napoleon had several important effects on Europe.  For one thing, he had spread the idea of liberalism, especially in Western and Central Europe.  By the same token, he had also spread the idea of nationalism in East and Central Europe.  Finally, his defeat prompted the victors to meet at the Congress of Vienna with the goal of turning back the clock to restore the Europe that had existed before the French Revolution.  This was especially the goal of the brilliant Austrian minister, Metternich who led much of the deliberations at Vienna.

The most pressing issue was what to do about France: punish it for causing all this trouble, or restore it to its former position as one of the great powers. Realizing that breaking up France would upset the balance of power, destabilize Europe, and lead to more revolutions, the allies restored it to its old position, punishing it with only a mild indemnity and short military occupation. However, the new king, Louis XVIII, was a constitutional, not an absolute monarch.  Even in defeat, the French Revolution had made progress. 

There were other changes in the political map of Europe and the world.  Britain took South Africa from the Dutch to secure its sea route to India.  In compensation, the Dutch got the Austrian Netherlands from Austria, which in turn received control of Northern Italy.  The Grand Duchy of Warsaw formed by Napoleon, continued to exist as the Kingdom of Poland, although its king also happened to be the Czar of Russia.  And Germany, thanks largely to Napoleon's administrative work, was consolidated into 38 states.  These last three changes would all contribute to nationalist revolts in succeeding years. 

For the time being, the Congress of Vienna did restore the old order and a period of relative international peace known as the Concert of Europe, since it saw the major powers working largely together for several years to guard the common peace and old order.  However, the ideas born in the French Revolution and spread by Napoleon had not been eliminated.  The seeds of revolution had taken root and were spreading rapidly across the face of Europe.  Like it or not, the age of kings was in its twilight and a new age of democratic and nationalistic reforms and upheavals was dawning.”
...from the website http://www.flowofhistory.com/[menupathalias]/fc108
 

LECTURE 1 NOTES...

POLITICAL CULTURE in 1700    versus    1800

Europe is Absolutist                           Europe is Nationalist

DIPLOMACY in 1700           versus  1800

Kings Rule Empires                                      Balance of Power                 

TENSION BETWEEN MONARCHS AND LIBERALS:


What would be easier to rule, a kingdom or a republic?

 
SOCIAL STATUS in 1700                versus              1800

Highly Divided—no fluidity                              Highly Divided—slightly more fluidity


JUST ONE EXAMPLE: FRANCE


Monarchy(100s)

   Clergy (100,000)

     Nobles (400,000)

       Commoners (24.5 million)

                        (greatest variety within the “commoners”)


ONE WAY TO ENVISION THE 19TH CENTURY 

IMAGINED COMMUNITIES


…imagined as both inherently limited and sovereign.


"The nation is imagined as limited because even the largest of them encompassing perhaps a billion living human beings, has finite, if elastic boundaries, beyond which lie other nations. No nation imagines itself coterminous with mankind. The most messianic nationalists do not dream of a day when all the members of the human race will join their nation in the way that it was possible, in certain epochs, for, say, Christians to dream of a wholly Christian planet.”

"It is imagined as sovereign because the concept was born in an age in which Enlightenment and Revolution were destroying the legitimacy of the divinely-ordained, hierarchical dynastic realm. Coming to maturity at a stage of human history when even the most devout adherents of any universal religion were inescapably confronted with the living pluralism of such religions, and the allomorphism between each faith's ontological claims and territorial stretch, nations dream of being free, and, if under God, directly so. The gage and emblem of this freedom is the sovereign state.”

"Finally, it is imagined as a community, because, regardless of the actual inequality and exploitation that may prevail in each, the nation is always conceived as a deep, horizontal comradeship. Ultimately it is this fraternity that makes it possible, over the past two centuries, for so many millions of people, not so much to kill, as willingly to die for such limited imaginings.”

"These deaths bring us abruptly face to face with the central problem posed by nationalism: what makes the shrunken imaginings of recent history (scarcely more than two centuries) generate such colossal sacrifices? I believe that the beginnings of an answer lie in the cultural roots of nationalism."

 

Tuesday, March 24, 2015

COURSE SYLLABUS

History 206-01 (CRN 31184)
Mon, Wed, Fri 10-11:25
Music 113
Office: Faculty Towers 201A
Instructor: Dr. Schmoll
Office Hours: Mon and Wed 11:30-12:30
…OR MAKE AN APPOINTMENT!!!

Office Phone: 654-6549

Course Description:

History 206: Western Civilization III: The cultural, political, social, economic, and intellectual development of Western civilization from 1815 to the present.  Readings in the literature and audiovisual explorations of the arts of Western civilization supplement the lectures.

History 206 is a lower division survey course and fulfills part of the requirement of the Western Civilization course series for the history major. It also is a general education course.
This course introduces you to the major historical events in Western history which contributed to the shaping of the modern world. Precisely, you will be looking at how the modern western world came about during the past two centuries and how the process we call "modernization" has affected people, primarily in Europe and the areas it colonized. You will, therefore, be following the major political, economical, social, and cultural changes from 1815 through the nineteenth and twentieth centuries as they move outward from Europe to the rest of the globe. We will examine both primary and secondary sources.

Course Learning Objectives:

By the end of the course students will be able:

1.To identify and define the most important events, people and processes of the transformation of Western Civ over the last 200 years.
2.To evaluate historical documents critically and to describe how these documents might be used in understanding and writing history.
3.To write a basic five-paragraph essay using historical evidence to support an argument.
4.To think more critically about history, how it is constructed, written and interpreted.

Required Reading:

1. The Communist Manifesto, Marx and Engels
2. Survival in Auschwitz, Primo Levi
3. One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich, Solzhenitsyn
4. Disturbing the Peace, Vaclav Havel

We will also have regular readings on the blog. Those will be announced in class.

COURSE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES:

The Midterm and Final:

We will go over the midterm and final exams later, but one consideration as you move through this course is this: both exams value your thinking on paper. You will be asked to recall information, to relate detail that you learned by paying close attention to reading and to class, but more than that you will be asked to make a contribution, to add your own unique perspective to the story. WHAT DOES IT MEAN WHEN I ASK YOU TO ARGUE SOMETHING? Start to answer that question from day one…even as we read this together in class right now. Every lecture you hear will contain a set of assertions that are not found in the text. These lectures are my attempt to create an original argument; they model for you how to make an argument in history. After all, who cares if you can recall a bunch of historical data? Well, I care. But the history of “what” is what turns many of us against history. You will be asked to take a stance, to use the information you learn in an argumentative context. The past is an argument that we make together here in class in the present.


The Paper:

This essay is around 5 pages, typed, double-spaced. You will turn it into turnitin.com. Late papers will be graded down one full grade per day late. This assignment is due on Friday, May 22nd. We will discuss the topics in class.


The Blog: If you have questions or comments about this class, or if you want to see the course reader or the syllabus online, just go to http://history206spring2015.blogspot.com/

You need to sign in to this blog this week. You will also have short readings on the blog each week. I will announce these in class.

COURSE POLICIES
Attendance: Just to be clear, to succeed on tests and papers you really should be in class. That’s just common sense, right? To pass this class, you may not miss more than two classes. If you miss that third class meeting, you are missing 15% of the quarter. You cannot do that and pass.


Reading: How should you read our books? How many of you love reading? I did not read a book until I was 18, so if you have not yet started your journey on this ever widening path, it’s never too late. In any course, there’s no substitute for reading. Theorist Jim Moffett says that “all real writing happens from plentitude,” meaning that you can only really write well about someone once you know about it. Reading is one way to know—not the only, by any means! I want you to have experiences with great texts. For these ten weeks, diving wholeheartedly into the course reading is vital. Remember to read in a particular way. As reading expert and UCSB professor Sheridan Blau has argued, “reading is as much a process of text production as writing is.” Reading involves revision? Does that sound silly? As you read, think about the different ways that you understand what you read. Most importantly, when you read, think about the words of E.D. Hirsch, who says that we look at what a text says (reading), what it means (interpretation), and why it matters (criticism). Hey, but if you are in a history course, aren’t you supposed to be reading for exactly the number of miles of trenches that were dug in World War One, how many railroad workers died from 1890 to 1917, or what the causes of the Great Depression were? Anyway, the answer is yes and no. There are two types of reading that you’ll do in college. As the literary goddess theorist Louise Rosenblatt explains, there is aesthetic reading, where you are reading to have an experience with the text, and there is efferent reading, where you are reading to take away information from the text. You do both types all the time. Think about a phone book. You have probably never heard someone say of a phone book, “don’t tell me about it, I want to read it for myself.” Reading a phone book is purely efferent. In this course you will practice both types of reading. I have chosen texts that you can enjoy (aesthetic) and that you can learn from(efferent). I want to see and appreciate the detail in our reading, but in this course I’ll give you that detail in class lectures. In the reading, it’s much more important that you read texts that will live with you forever and to inspire you to think more thoroughly about your world. As you read, you should be working hard to create meaning for yourself. As Rosenblatt asserts, “taking someone else’s interpretation as your own is like having someone else eat your dinner for you.”

How fast should you be reading? With our texts, I expect you to move through fairly quickly. I will model this for you in class, but basically, you should be looking for key pieces of information from each section. Take notes on it, but do not take such copious notes that you slow your reading to a snail’s pace. Instead, let your note taking help the reading go faster. Again, I will model this in class. The text will guide our in class discussion, and you will have it with you. So be sure you have read it for each Thursday class.

Being Prompt: Get to class on time. Why does that matter? First, it sends the wrong message to your principal grader(that’s me). As much as we in the humanities would like you to believe that these courses are objective (at what time of day did the Battle of the Marne begin?), that is not entirely the case. If you send your principal grader the message that you don’t mind missing the first few minutes and disturbing others in the class, don’t expect to be given the benefit of the doubt when the tests and papers roll around. Does that sound mean? It’s not meant to, but just remember, your actions send signals. Being late also means that someone who already has everything out and is ready and is involved in the discussion has to stop, move everything over, get out of the chair to let you by, pick up the pencil you drop, let you borrow paper, run to the bathroom because you spilled the coffee, and so on. It’s rude. There’s an old saying: better two hours early than two minutes late. Old sayings are good.
So, what are the consequences of persistent tardiness? What do you think they should be? Remember that 10% participation? You are eligible for that grade if you are on time. And no, I’m not the jackass who watches for you to be late that one time and stands at the door and points in your face. If you are late a few (that means three) times, you will lose the entire 10% participation grade. One time tardiness is not a problem precisely because it is not persistent. It’s an accident. But if you are late several times, you will not be able to receive a participation grade above 50%.

The Unforgivable Curse: Speaking of one time issues, there is something that is so severe, so awful, that if it happens one time, just one time, no warning, no “oh hey I noticed this and if you could stop it that’d be super,” you will automatically lose all 10 percent of the Participation grade. Any guesses? C’mon, you must have some idea. No, it’s not your telephone ringing. If that happens, it’ll just be slightly funny and we’ll move on. It’s a mistake and not intentional, and the increased heart rate and extra sweat on your brow from you diving headfirst into an overstuffed book bag to find a buried phone that is now playing that new Cristina Aguilera ringtone is punishment enough for you. So, what is it, this unforgivable crime? Texting. If you take out your phone one time to send or receive messages you will automatically lose 10% of your course grade. That means, if you receive a final grade of 85%, it will drop to 75%. If you receive a final grade of 75%, it will become a 65%. Why is that? The phone ringing is an accident. Texting is on purpose and is rude. It, in fact, is beyond rude. It wreaks of the worst of our current society. It bespeaks the absolutely vile desire we all have to never separate from our technological tether for even a moment. It sends your fellow classmates and your teacher the signal that you have better things to do. Checking your phone during class is like listening to a friend’s story and right in the middle turning away and talking to someone else. Oh, and guess what, this room is designed to give your teacher a perfect view of you with a phone beneath the table; is that text message really worth 10% of the quarter grade? Plus, the way our brains work, you need to fully immerse yourself, to tune your brain into an optimal, flowing machine (see Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi’s incredible book Flow) that can grasp and can let itself go. Students now tend to see school as a stopover on their way to a career. Brothers and sisters, that’s deadly! I wish that I could pay for you all to quit your jobs and just focus on the mind. I can’t yet do that, but if I could I would, because it’d be worth every penny. Devoting time to the mind and to thinking deeply about your world will change who you are and how you approach your future, your family, your job, and your everything. Is that overstated? I believe it to be true. So, until my stock choices really take off so that I can pay all of your bills, promise me one thing: when you are in class or preparing for class, you have to be fully here. Oh crap, now it’s going to sound like a hippy professor from the 1960s: “I mean, like, be here man, just be here.” Maybe the hippies were on to something. Devote yourself fully to your classes by unplugging from the outside world for a while.

Participation: You do not need to be the person who speaks out the most, asks the most questions, or comes up with the most brilliant historical arguments to receive full credit in participation. If you are in class and on time, discuss the issues that we raise, avoid the temptation to nod off, to leave early, or to text people during class (the three easiest ways to lose credit), and in general act like you care, then you will receive a good participation grade! 

Just being here does not guarantee a 100% participation grade, since you must be regularly actively involved for that to be possible.

In fact, to get a 90% participation grade or higher, you must attend all classes, contribute thoughtful comments to the larger class discussion every day, participate actively with those around you, and avoid the obvious: no sleeping, no texting, no using this course to study for other courses, no being late.

To get an 85%, you can miss one class and must contribute at least one comment per week to the large class discussion, participate actively with those around you, and avoid the obvious: no sleeping, no texting, no using this course to study for other courses, no being late.

To get an 80%, you can miss one class and must participate actively with those around you, and avoid the obvious: no sleeping, no texting, no using this course to study for other courses, no being late.

To get a 75%, you can miss two classes and must participate actively with those around you, and avoid the obvious: no sleeping, no texting, no using this course to study for other courses, no being late.

Show up tardy more than once or fail to participate in the dialogue and the participation grade will diminish quickly.

Academic Integrity: The principles of truth and integrity are recognized as fundamental to a community of teachers and scholars. The University expects that both faculty and students will honor these principles and in so doing will protect the integrity of all academic work and student grades. Students are expected to do all work assigned to them without unauthorized assistance and without giving unauthorized assistance. Faculty have the responsibility of exercising care in the planning and supervision of academic work so that honest effort will be encouraged and positively reinforced. http://www.csub.edu/studentconduct/documents/academicintegrity.pdf

GRADING SCALE:

Participation:                           10%
In class book assignment:        5% pass/no pass
Paper:                                       25%  
Midterm Examination:             30%
Final Examination:                  30%

COURSE SCHEDULE:

WEEK 1:
3/30  Mon    Introduction to Course
4/1    Wed    Post­Revolutionary Europe : The legacy of the French
 and American revolutions for Europe in the nineteenth   century.
4/3     Fri      Alternative class meeting today…

WEEK 2:
4/6   Mon      Industrialism/Reading Guide for Communist Manifesto
4/8   Wed      Industrialism
4/10  Fri       The Early Socialists

WEEK 3:
4/13   Mon     “Communist Manifesto” must be read by today.
4/15   Wed     Revolutions of 1848/Nationalism
4/17     Fri       Scrambling for Africa

WEEK 4:
4/20  Mon   World War I       
4/22  Wed   Russian Revolution
4/24  Fri       Chaos Reigns: the 1920s

WEEK 5:.
4/27   Mon   MIDTERM EXAM
4/29   Wed     The Rise of Hitler
5/1     Fri        World War Two and the Horrors of War

WEEK 6:
5/4   Mon      Survival in Auschwitz Due  
5/6   Wed     The Post War World
5/8     Fri      The Cold War

WEEK 7:
5/11   Mon    Stalin’s Russia 
5/13   Wed   One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich  Due
5/15    Fri     Europe in 1960

WEEK 8:
Schmoll is at a GE conference this week...we will have class online. Details to follow.
YOUR PAPER IS DUE THIS WEEK...Friday, May 22

WEEK 9:
May 25th        Memorial Day...CAMPUS CLOSED
5/27   Wed     Decolonization around the World
5/29      Fri     Decolonization: Algeria

WEEK 10:
6/1   Mon    Europe pulling itself Apart  
6/3   Wed    Disturbing the Peace Due 
6/6     Fri     The New Europe and the European Union

Week 10 plus..
6/8   Mon   LAST DAY OF CLASS: MULTIPLE CHOICE TEST PORTION

FINAL EXAM
Wednesday, June 10th, 11-1:30